Closed shiraeeshi closed 3 years ago
Many thanks, I have merged. The split chapters to page will need to work properly and will be the default option. The user can turn it off if required using the setting.
Should we merge dev into master?
No..I will need to implement the pages function in dev before it can be merged into master. Currently people can get the default chapter split on master branch
That was a bad choice of words in my previous post. I meant should we merge changes from dev into master (without removing the dev branch)? I want to merge little changes between branches so that we don't have to deal with complicated conflicts when merging later if master and dev branches accumulate a lot of changes.
Yes that’s a good idea. Although my next change should be the pages splitting one.
This PR merges recent changes from master into dev: translations, position-related functionality, leaf-over-page-by-edge setting.
This PR is intended to make merging changes from dev into master easier, because merge conflicts are already resolved here.
@babluboy , after accepting this PR you can merge changes from dev into master, we can do that because we've added a setting to allow user to choose whether to divide chapters to pages or not. I don't know if it's a good idea though: if we leave dividing chapters to pages setting to true as default, it might be confusing for a user if it doesn't work and he sees a blank page instead of a book contents. Maybe we should make the setting disabled by default until the functionality is stable?