Closed Enaium closed 2 weeks ago
Thank you very much. The workload of this PR is very large, and the unit test is also very complete. It is a high-quality PR, so subjectively I am very willing to merge it.
However, after researching, it is not easy to make all other parts of the framework perfectly match the new model architecture after merging this PR. At the current priority, I have no time to give an unified support for kotlin value types (not just for the specialization of these Uxxx types). After all the more critical tasks are completed in the future, I will consider unified support for kotlin 1.5 inline value type types and absorb the DSL part of this PR. Hope for understanding.
Fixes #764