could property function names match what haxe does for "default"?

[raould]

it feels odd that if i have an interface that specifies properties, and want to use that with tink_lang, then i have to do something like:

var foo(get_foo,null):String

instead of just

var foo(default,null):String

[back2dos]

I think I'll just add support for interfaces, so that either way you write @:read var foo:String;

Would that work for you?

[raould]

sure, and it isn't a big stopping deal type issue overall anyway, probably :)

[back2dos]

Ok, @:read and @:write are now supported for interfaces. It should be noted though, that if I implements Cls and A implements I, it will also be affected by the @:autoBuild.

Also, to actually get this to work with haxelib, I had to delete prior versions of tink (didn't have the patience to delete one by one, so deleting all did the trick).