Closed stpaultim closed 3 weeks ago
@stpaultim I was thinking the same thing. Early work on this is in the latest code.
Nice work.
I would bold the words "Provided by". Treat them as a label.
I'm not sure if you must indicate "module" or "theme" here, but it does not hurt. Removing it would simplify the UI a bit, but not much.
I think it's helpful to have the provider type listed for the detail view -- e.g. if you are filtering from all providers on a keyword, it brings some additional clarity.
My only thought is that the information is not as easy to see on the page as it could be. In some way highlighting the "provided by" could help, a little bit.
However, I think what you have is pretty good and I would be happy to close this issue if you think it's good enough.
This should be fixed in https://github.com/backdrop-contrib/icon_browser/commit/2e0d3b54381d10de117bdfe4c0a7b4ce80adfa16
@laryn - I like the bold label, but the results have dissappeared for me.
Thanks @stpaultim -- good catch. A slight regression was introduced when adding the pager (the confusion between the provider key and icon name again). This also helped me find a place to improve the returned result when a request is made to icon_browser_icon_details()
and no icon is found with that key. Fixed in https://github.com/backdrop-contrib/icon_browser/commit/d864965a1b84e89205e6f11959e5a33f57b8da47
We have the ability to filter icons and show those provided by modules.
Would it be possible or helpful to also provide information about which module, theme, or core provided each icon?