Open jenlampton opened 1 year ago
The biggest con, for me, would be discouraging contributors who got a low rating on a project. The Backdrop world doesn't work like wordpress where each project costs money and thus has budget for upkeep and improvements. Here we rely on contributors volunteering their time, and if a project gets a bad score that could reflect poorly on the contributor, or worse, cause them not to want to continue with that project, or even at all.
If we could find a rating system that didn't allow negative feedback, I think that would be preferable.
Something like a thumbs-up only rating system would still allow us to count the thumbs up to rank projects, but would be less likely to negatively affect contribution.
The biggest con, for me, would be discouraging contributors who got a low rating on a project. The Backdrop world doesn't work like wordpress where each project costs money and thus has budget for upkeep and improvements. Here we rely on contributors volunteering their time, and if a project gets a bad score that could reflect poorly on the contributor, or worse, cause them not to want to continue with that project, or even at all.
I totally agree with this point. If I put loads of effort into making a module work and someone negatively rated it because they misunderstood the purpose (happens all the time in retail - people mark down because it didn't do what they thought it would do even though the description is clear), it may dissuade me from putting any more effort in.
We do sometimes get people in the forum who act like they're paying for Backdrop and expect it to be perfect in every way, not recognising that we are all volunteers and may not have time to respond as quickly as they would like.
For me, a rating system would not be of any use...
If I need functionality, and a module seems to offer that functionality I will give it a try...
If it works for my use case then all is good, should I give it a thumbs up or 5 stars?
But, if it doesn't work for my use case, would I give it a thumbs down and a 1 star?
Neither would be indicative of the functionality or usability of the module, so I think a rating would be ineffective.
I much prefer the "Date created", "Last updated" and "Usage statistics"...
For me, better descriptions in the readme would be more helpful than a rating system.
Hope that makes sense...
I'm the same as you @albanycomputers, but there are probably people who don't feel comfortable making that evaluation. I don't know exactly how to make things better for them, but it's certainly worth the discussion.
If we could find a rating system that didn't allow negative feedback, I think that would be preferable.
I think the ability to "favorite" modules might fit this criteria and be useful. Just a way for folks to show that they like a specific module and a way to generate a list of "most popular" modules that is different from pure usage statistics. This would not allow for any negative feedback and would be quite simple. Not to mention, it's easy to implement with the flag module and nothing else.
Just a thought.
I love it. We could then also show a list of each person's favorite projects on their profile :) I think this is a great first step. I'll create a dedicated issue for it...
edit: here's the issue: https://github.com/backdrop-ops/backdropcms.org/issues/1022 Feedback welcome over there, but I think we have an actionable item here! 🎉 thank you @stpaultim
Love it... that way I can easily add the modules I regularly use to a project without having to (a) remember their names lol and (b) go through each page... going.... "ohhh yeah, I like this one... oh... I forgot about that" :)
In the meta issue for improving project pages, a 5-star rating was discussed. There may be better options than 5-star that could work for this purpose, and we might want to evaluate some of those.
The first that comes to mind, would be allowing a thumbs-up or kudos to be added to a comment, to up-vote a project. But with no matching ability to down-vote or negatively rate a project.
PROS of having ratings:
CONS of having ratings:
ALTERNATIVES that have been considered: