search

baconwaifu / propforth

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/propforth
0 stars 0 forks source link

tutorial-4.1 SD.txt #118

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?

After running tut-2.1,
prompt is PROT33

running step 2:

+++
Fsload_fswr.f

---
fsload fswr.f
###
fsload fswr.f
SNET11 Cog5 ok

----------------------
does NOT give me the SNET11 prompt, I still see SNET33

Also the fsdrop gives differnt results, 

>>>
PROT33 Cog6 ok
fsls

0_000_032_768 01_106 fswr.f
0_000_033_920 01_970 serial.f
0_000_035_904 08_884 DevKernel.f
0_000_044_864 00_822 boot.f

0_000_019_840 bytes free in EEPROM file system
PROT33 Cog6 ok
fsdrop
PROT33 Cog6 ok
fsls

0_000_032_768 01_106 fswr.f
0_000_033_920 01_970 serial.f
0_000_035_904 08_884 DevKernel.f

0_000_020_672 bytes free in EEPROM file system
PROT33 Cog6 ok
=======================

maybe I made a mistake with the comments for dev kernel, will re-run

Original issue reported on code.google.com by prof.bra...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2012 at 6:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
confirming that the SNET11 propmt does not appear, as above.

Consider re-naming line 56 test to
FSDROP0

to go along with fsdrop1 in the next step,and help diferentiate from the step 
name andthe command.  My eyes are going buggy.

Also consider FSLS steps before and after th FSDROP steps to to confirm we are 
on the right track.

Original comment by prof.bra...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2012 at 6:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
up to step 9 reboot, we load 7 files as set up with no test or confirmation 
actions.

Should there at least be an fsls at the end to confirm we have all loaded 
correctly?

Original comment by prof.bra...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2012 at 6:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
remainder of test works fine, and I see the SNET11 prompt now

Consider: after the first step to reboot and hold ESC, if the following 
instruction is to do fsclear, the hold ESC issue goes away.  This might be a 
good step, since we plan to reload all the files anyway

Original comment by prof.bra...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2012 at 6:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Comment 1 agreed.

Comment 2, i have avoided using fsls in test as this needs to be updated very 
time you make any changes to the tiles. Plan is to start doing this for 
automated regression.

Original comment by salsa...@gmail.com on 9 Feb 2012 at 5:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
CLOSED

Original comment by salsa...@gmail.com on 12 Feb 2012 at 3:47