Open plaindocs opened 5 years ago
For the flight home:
@plaindocs I assume you are looking for reviewers to be able to apply tags at will... or would you prefer some predefined taxonomy?
At will, I think. It is a pretty loose affair.
OK, I've finished CRUDing all the basic tables in the DB, including support for: tags (stored as JSON, per submission) and talk states (Draft -> Submitted -> Reviewed -> Rejected / Accepted by default). I am going to move on with Issue #25 before moving on with this feature dump.
Tagging talks
Talk states - I'm not 100% certain how we want this. But Submitted -> Selected / Rejected / Wait list -> Confirmed would be a good start.
In Grorg we've ended up with a mess of talk allocations, because even though you can set talks types per conf (ie, 30 min talk, 60 min talk), the allocation doesn't restrict that. But that is deep in the weeds.
We've already mentioned anonymous rating round
Proposal form that does not require login. However it would be useful to give accepted speakers a login that lets them update talk title, upload photo etc.
Email speakers, with reject / waitlist / selected with Templates, and variables. (Reject all except selected.)
Speaker export to yaml compatible with current yaml structure.