Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
example.epml file has two epc elements, and the second one is an empty epc with
some elements produced because of bug (some used lists didn't get cleared
before start processing another epc). The bug has been fixed.
The other two EPML files don't have a dictionary element. That causes producing
an empty CPF file. When i manually add the dictionary, it works. However, i
didn't investigate the produced files semantically where i am going to do so
with the test cases.
Would like me to update the canonizer to process the EPML file even though
there is no dictionary?
Original comment by aah.shareef@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2010 at 5:33
I think you mean 'directory' and not 'dictionary'. Yes, we should also be able
to parse EPML files which are not well-formed, i.e. that do not have a
dictionary or dependencies element. When you are done, make sure you deploy the
new version to brahms and to the Win box, and that you notify all the team
members. Also, send a release note to Marie, so that she can incorporate this
into the main release notes document.
Original comment by marcello...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2010 at 6:07
Yes, i meant 'directory'.
EPML facade has been updated, Specifically, TypeEPML class. New version of the
EPML canonizers has been uploaded to google code. I am not able to deploy to
brahms and Win box due to some technical issues in my machine.
Original comment by aah.shareef@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2010 at 7:31
Original comment by aah.shareef@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2010 at 1:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
marcello...@gmail.com
on 12 Aug 2010 at 2:32Attachments: