baires / shouldideploy

Source of shouldideploy.today
https://shouldideploy.today/
Do What The F*ck You Want To Public License
424 stars 80 forks source link

build(deps-dev): bump eslint-plugin-react from 7.34.2 to 7.34.4 #1200

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 4 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Bumps eslint-plugin-react from 7.34.2 to 7.34.4.

Release notes

Sourced from eslint-plugin-react's releases.

v7.34.4

Fixed

  • [prop-types]: fix className missing in prop validation false negative (#3749 @​akulsr0)
  • [sort-prop-types]: Check for undefined before accessing node.typeAnnotation.typeAnnotation (#3779 @​tylerlaprade)

#1000: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1000 #1002: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1002 #1005: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1005 #100: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#100 #1010: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1010 #1013: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1013 #1022: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1022 #1029: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1029 #102: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#102 #1034: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1034 #1038: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1038 #1041: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1041 #1043: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1043 #1046: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1046 #1047: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1047 #1050: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1050 #1053: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1053 #1057: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1057 #105: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#105 #1061: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1061 #1062: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1062 #1070: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1070 #1071: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1071 #1073: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1073 #1076: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1076 #1079: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1079 #1088: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1088 #1098: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1098 #1101: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1101 #1103: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1103 #110: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#110 #1116: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1116 #1117: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1117 #1119: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1119 #1121: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1121 #1122: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1122 #1123: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1123 #1130: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1130 #1131: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1131 #1132: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1132 #1134: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1134 #1135: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1135 #1139: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1139 #1148: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1148

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from eslint-plugin-react's changelog.

7.34.4 - 2024.07.13

Fixed

  • [prop-types]: fix className missing in prop validation false negative (#3749[] @​akulsr0)
  • [sort-prop-types]: Check for undefined before accessing node.typeAnnotation.typeAnnotation (#3779[] @​tylerlaprade)

#3779: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3779 #3749: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3749

7.34.3 - 2024.06.18

Fixed

  • [prop-types]: null-check rootNode before calling getScope (#3762[] @​crnhrv)
  • [boolean-prop-naming]: avoid a crash with a spread prop (#3733[] @​ljharb)
  • [jsx-boolean-value]: assumeUndefinedIsFalse with never must not allow explicit true value (#3757[] @​6uliver)
  • [no-object-type-as-default-prop]: enable rule for components with many parameters (#3768[] @​JulienR1)
  • [jsx-key]: incorrect behavior for checkKeyMustBeforeSpread with map callbacks (#3769[] @​akulsr0)

#3769: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3769 #3768: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3768 #3762: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3762 #3757: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3757 #3733: jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#3733

Commits
  • 7a7b756 Update CHANGELOG and bump version
  • 67d73aa [Fix] sort-prop-types: Check for undefined before accessing `node.typeAnnot...
  • 51d342b [patch] make TS happy
  • f1ae6ed [Refactor] sort-comp: use Object.entries instead of for-in
  • bcb987a [Refactor] use hasown instead of the larger object.hasown
  • eda77f3 [Refactor] avoid making a holey array
  • 3c1d520 [Dev Deps] downgrade eslint-remote-tester-repositories
  • b747450 [Fix] prop-types: fix className missing in prop validation false negative
  • cef8123 Update CHANGELOG and bump version
  • eb56061 [Deps] update array.prototype.tosorted
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
vercel[bot] commented 4 months ago

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
shouldideploy ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 15, 2024 9:12am
baires commented 4 months ago

Coverage report

Branches coverage not met for global: expected >=90%, but got 78.125%
St.:grey_question:
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 95.08% 58/61
🟡 Branches 78.13% 25/32
🟢 Functions 95% 19/20
🟢 Lines 95% 57/60

Test suite run success

24 tests passing in 2 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from d4d283df02c42881df9e65b9f48d1e687765c00f

dependabot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Superseded by #1205.