Closed wizard-28 closed 2 years ago
Cool.
It's probably best to keep packaging out of this repo and in a downstream location.
Okay!
However, the linked pull request doesn't look right. It's just downloading the x86_64 binary regardless of the architecture of the user. If you want to make a single package that works for everyone, it's better to just get the script version and add a dependency on Lua
We only support x86_64
at the moment, We have plans for other architectures in the next version. I would just add the -bin
pacscript for now, and update it with multi architecture support in the future.
I'm making a variant package with the fennel script, which one do you want us to add to the wiki? I guess the latter for now.
I've added the script variant: https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall-programs/pull/763
OK cool; sounds good.
Oh, I also noticed that the packaging doesn't seem to do any verification of the checksum or signature; that looks like a pretty major oversight too.
Oh, I also noticed that the packaging doesn't seem to do any verification of the checksum or signature; that looks like a pretty major oversight too.
We do checksum verification, and we'll take signature verification into consideration for our python rewrite.
Pacstall is a community-driven AUR-like package manager for Ubuntu. We have an ongoing pull request to add
fennel-bin
to our repository.We have a few questions for you: