Closed johngrantuk closed 4 weeks ago
Thanks @johngrantuk!
I'm not against adding this, but I do see a few issues:
If you think it's still worth it to have it without any sort of common base interface we can proceed like this anyways. Thoughts? @danielmkm
I did a bit of a refactor here.
I did a bit of a refactor here.
* Changed the functions to return structs * Renamed the functions to have unique namespaces * Moved both dynamic and immutable function to the pool contract level
Thanks for this. It works for me 🙏
This should be ready for one last review before :ship:
Generated at commit: 3094a9f5ebac5e9c5d9c493248b068861f03d31c
🚨 Report Summary
Severity Level Results Contracts Critical High Medium Low Note Total 2 2 0 11 37 52 Dependencies Critical High Medium Low Note Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector
Description
Adds new getters:
getMutableData
toPoolInfo
andgetImmutableData
to Stable/Weighted pools. Goal was to try and:Type of change
Checklist:
main
, or there's a description of how to mergeIssue Resolution