Closed brudfors closed 3 years ago
It is true. I am a bit torned. Having the neuroimaging label at least makes it clear that we only plan on supporting NI file formats (from nibabel).
Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 18:58, Mikael Brudfors notifications@github.com a écrit :
Looking at the name of the package 'nitorch: neuroimaging in pytorch', isn't it a bit more general than this? I would say nothing at all is neuroimaging specific? And the superres algorithm I am working on is neither.
What do you say @balbasty https://github.com/balbasty?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/balbasty/nitorch/issues/13, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB3RHOW4OB5LLY4BDQVMNADRWJUEDANCNFSM4N4Q552A .
--
Yaël Balbastre Research Associate -- Physics https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/team/physics-team/ / Computational Anatomy https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/team/computational-anatomy-team/ Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging Institute of Neurology - University College London 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG
I think ni stands for neuroimaing, or? Maybe it should be niitorch? I call my superres project, niiproc.
Wait, why two 'i'?
Because of the file extension
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, 19:11 Yaël Balbastre, notifications@github.com wrote:
Wait, why two 'i'?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/balbasty/nitorch/issues/13#issuecomment-643416398, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQ533SGJ76ZM3D6INGDQTDRWJVUTANCNFSM4N4Q552A .
Ho right! But there are more neuroimaging formats than nifti. nibabel reads a bunch of them.
If not nitorch, a proposal? Something related to medical imaging?
Okay, the maybe something with medical imaging in it? Or just nitorch, it is good too :)
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, 19:18 Yaël Balbastre, notifications@github.com wrote:
Ho right! But there are more neuroimaging formats than nifti. nibabel reads a bunch of them.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/balbasty/nitorch/issues/13#issuecomment-643419048, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQ533Q24TUPU7LWTWDAMYLRWJWOFANCNFSM4N4Q552A .
Looking at the name of the package 'nitorch: neuroimaging in pytorch', isn't it a bit more general than this? I would say nothing at all is neuroimaging specific? And the superres algorithm I am working on is neither.
What do you say @balbasty?