Open eddieajau opened 9 years ago
Sounds reasonable to me.
:+1: Yup!
Ok thanks. What I might do is end up refactoring the whole TOC if that's ok.
Ended up refactoring the whole repo.
https://github.com/eddieajau/waterline-docs/tree/refactor
Comments welcome.
Oh wow, awesome work @eddieajau! My comments below, all minor things:
1.In installation.md I don't think we need the stuff in New to Node.js? and further below since someone interested in waterline is very likely already using node.
This is a very significant improvement to the docs, now just from glancing at the README.md one can immediately grasp waterline's features. Great stuff, thanks for this!
Thanks.
I've moved the new-to-node to it's own page and made the link less conspicuous. I think the page is worthwhile, if only to be a search engine magnet once in a while.
I've made dominance less dominant.
I've written the page on testing. It's one of many possible solutions but it works (suggestions welcome).
Integration and sails - yeah I know. Basically I wanted a page to explain water Sails automatically wires up for you. At the moment it's in the round-to-it bucket.
@eddieajau you are on :fire: ! I like the new changes :+1:
Regarding this topic, we should address the issue raised in https://github.com/balderdashy/waterline/issues/992#issuecomment-100938444, namely what sails calls One Way Association, waterline calls it One-to-one. We really should be clear and consistent as this confuses people...
I'd like to refactor the "association" doc page into separate pages for each type of association, and make sure the information is in line with the Sails docs at the same time. Does that sound reasonable?