While I know this might be an edge case but might uncover something more interesting.
I've accidentally downloaded the ia32 version of Etcher from the website, and tried to run the AppImage before realizing it. It resulted in:
~/Downloads/etcher> ./balenaEtcher-1.5.78-ia32.AppImage
dlopen(): error loading libfuse.so.2
AppImages require FUSE to run.
You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage
if you run it with the --appimage-extract option.
See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE
for more information
exit 1
~/Downloads/etcher> squashfs-root/balena-etcher-electron
Gtk-Message: 08:42:31.005: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"
Checking for update
ready-to-show: 2517.655ms
Update for version 1.5.78 is not available (latest version: 1.5.78, downgrade is disallowed).
then it works, and corectly burns stuff.
Same if I start with the AppRun
~/Downloads/etcher> squashfs-root/AppRun
Gtk-Message: 08:43:11.356: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"
Checking for update
ready-to-show: 2472.083ms
Update for version 1.5.78 is not available (latest version: 1.5.78, downgrade is disallowed).
The x64 version can run totally fine from an .AppImage in either case.
This issue with the 32-bit version is present to at least 1.5.49 that I went back to check, didn't look further. Also, I don't have a 32-bit machine at the moment to check whether the AppImage runs correctly there, but might try in the future.
Cheers!
While I know this might be an edge case but might uncover something more interesting. I've accidentally downloaded the
ia32
version of Etcher from the website, and tried to run the AppImage before realizing it. It resulted in:The thing, though, that if I do an extract:
and then run it directly
then it works, and corectly burns stuff. Same if I start with the
AppRun
The x64 version can run totally fine from an
.AppImage
in either case.This issue with the 32-bit version is present to at least
1.5.49
that I went back to check, didn't look further. Also, I don't have a 32-bit machine at the moment to check whether the AppImage runs correctly there, but might try in the future. Cheers!