Started removing some of the uses of intmuttree on the parser tests.
Have also replaced a bunch of the parameters on the parse function with a single "parserconfig" struct, to allow us an easier time when we extend the parser later.
However, I am hitting some roadblocks around the Canonical XML feature, specifically for those tests that compare a file against its canonical representation... I can't seem to figure out how to get equality checks against two smite trees.
error[E0369]: binary operation `==` cannot be applied to type `Rc<xrust::trees::smite::Node>`
--> tests\conformance\xml\xmltest_valid_sa.rs:293:46
|
293 | assert!(testxml.get_canonical().unwrap() == canonicalxml);
| -------------------------------- ^^ ------------ Rc<xrust::trees::smite::Node>
| |
| Rc<xrust::trees::smite::Node>
Mind taking a look? The other changes here should be fine to push in, if we can figure out the document comparison then I should be able to swap over the rest easily enough.
So for the tree comparison, you want to know if two trees represent the same XML Infoset? I'll see if I can use the PartialEq trait for that. Otherwise, I can define a comparison method on the Node trait.
Hi Steve,
Started removing some of the uses of intmuttree on the parser tests.
Have also replaced a bunch of the parameters on the parse function with a single "parserconfig" struct, to allow us an easier time when we extend the parser later.
However, I am hitting some roadblocks around the Canonical XML feature, specifically for those tests that compare a file against its canonical representation... I can't seem to figure out how to get equality checks against two smite trees.
Mind taking a look? The other changes here should be fine to push in, if we can figure out the document comparison then I should be able to swap over the rest easily enough.