Currently we have the width for packages hardcoded to 18. Maybe we have to make this bigger, or check all package names and take a max(min_width, max_package_width) approach, where min_width is 18 (or similar), and max_package_width the width of the longest package name.
Currently we have the width for packages hardcoded to 18. Maybe we have to make this bigger, or check all package names and take a
max(min_width, max_package_width)approach, wheremin_widthis 18 (or similar), andmax_package_widththe width of the longest package name.