Addresses #39 in a slightly different way by populating the block_id attribute. Presumably, this would be the same as the input if defining a block_id on call. But most importantly, the executed block number is made available for latest.
Since multicall.py effectively no longer uses MC1 contracts, I don't see any compatibility issues.
Addresses #39 in a slightly different way by populating the
block_id
attribute. Presumably, this would be the same as the input if defining a block_id on call. But most importantly, the executed block number is made available forlatest
.Since multicall.py effectively no longer uses MC1 contracts, I don't see any compatibility issues.