Is it possible to maintain this project?

[tkna91]

@qubidt Sorry if I offended you. I see that you took over this project at #114, is it still difficult for you to maintain it? I am not sure if I am allowed to use this tool since you have not even started merging pull requests or organizing issues. If the project is not maintained and I can't find anyone else to take over, I would probably be better off looking for an alternative backup system, but since the tool is so complete, will that be a problem? I have not yet tested or operated the tool.

I would appreciate anyone's honest opinion. I am sorry if I have offended you.

[baodrate]

No offense taken. Sorry I haven't updated. I actually did merge most of the PRs in my fork before this repo was transferred over. I even have a bunch of refactoring I haven't committed yet because I wanted to set up tests and automation first. Unfortunately things piled up and I never got around to it.

I'll try to get this all done by this weekend. If I let it slip please feel free to ping me again.

[tkna91]

As for me, it seems that for now I have found a simpler alternative (rsync to btrfs managed by snapper) and I don't have to use snap-sync. However, I think closing it is also a problem, so if anyone is interested, please discuss.

[ohoes]

@qubidt

I think you've let it slip.

@tkna91

I'm still interested in the project.

[marccollin]

As for me, it seems that for now I have found a simpler alternative (rsync to btrfs managed by snapper) and I don't have to use snap-sync. However, I think closing it is also a problem, so if anyone is interested, please discuss.

you mean this project: https://github.com/thkukuk/rsync-backup ?

[tkna91]

@marccollin Sorry my English is not good enough to translate well. I don't have the motivation to resolve this Issue because as a user I have found another alternative, but I think this Issue is necessary until releases and maintenance are resumed. If you need this project, you can discuss it in this Issue.

[tkna91]

@marccollin

you mean this project: https://github.com/thkukuk/rsync-backup ?

No. But the project sounds interesting as well. My need is to store data from the main machine with snapshots on a separate backup server. Since it was not absolutely necessary to backup all snapshots on the main machine, I realized that it would be sufficient to transfer the current data via syncthing or rsync to the storage managed by the btrfs snapper on the backup server, which would be simpler and more flexible to changing circumstances. It was simpler and more flexible to adapt to changing circumstances. And it has worked well in my case.

[evansan]

@qubidt you let it slip

[real-user]

Is this project dead? I've been using ut for many years without issues, but it's worrying if no one maintain the project as it is relies so much on snapper that might change at any time.

[tkna91]

@real-user If you are using btrfs only, I personally recommend btrbk. You can also backup with btrfs send through ssh. https://digint.ch/btrbk/

If you only want to do differential backups of local directories, you can set it up like this.

/etc/btrbk/btrbk.conf

snapshot_create         onchange
timestamp_format        long-iso
snapshot_preserve_min   3h
snapshot_preserve       24h 7d 4w 12m *y
target_preserve_min     3h
target_preserve         24h 7d 4w 12m *y
archive_preserve_min    3h
archive_preserve        24h 7d 4w 12m *y
archive_exclude         @swap

volume /mnt/.root_pool
    snapshot_dir @snapshots
    subvolume @
    subvolume @home
    subvolume @var_log

It is troublesome at first, but once set up, it is convenient.

[real-user]

Thanks for the suggestions @tkna91. I've been thinking to migrate to btrbk due to that snap-sync does seem to be abandonware at this point. But it is very sad as this software works perfectly and I like how it uses snapper.

Not that I am missing any feature in snap-sync and I like how it is integrated in snapper but it is in general never a good idea to rely on abandoned software in case any of the underlying libs/programs change in the future.

[tkna91]

@real-user I like btrbk because it works simpler than snapper. There is no management by snapper-id or xml file. Just include the type stamp in the directory name and back it up using snapshot or btrfs-send|btrfs-receive.

There is an option to migrate to this, but I can't evaluate its merits or demerits. https://github.com/rzerres/dsnap-sync