Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Thanks for filing this FAQ entry to the issue tracker.
http://ganttproject.blogspot.com/search/label/faq
Original comment by dbarashev
on 19 Apr 2011 at 9:18
See also issue #220
Original comment by dbarashev
on 10 May 2011 at 10:58
hello,
it's possible for a 2.5 on windows 7?
Thank's,
Pol
Original comment by polma...@gmail.com
on 16 Feb 2012 at 12:49
If it was possible it would have been one of the major highlights of GP 2.5.
The list of the major improvements is here: http://www.ganttproject.biz/praha
Original comment by dbarashev
on 16 Feb 2012 at 1:00
[deleted comment]
I'm new here and I don't understand Issue 225. Does Accepted mean there is a
commitment to implement Durations of hours, days, and months? And is it a
medium priority task which nobody has committed to?
I'm running GanttProject on an iMac and could really use this feature.
Thanks for any clarification.
Original comment by ntwork...@gmail.com
on 1 Mar 2012 at 9:13
Accepted means that need is acknowledged. We normally don't use priority field,
it is "medium" in all issues.
Original comment by dbarashev
on 1 Mar 2012 at 9:16
Does acknowledged mean that the feature will be added eventually?
Original comment by thompson...@sbcglobal.net
on 1 Mar 2012 at 9:20
We'll be working on this particular issue, but in general acknowledged means
"yes, we understand the request in general, and if someone is willing to work
on it, we are opened for discussion". No promises.
I hope you know that GanttProject is not a commercial product. We work on it
when we have spare time. That's normally not more than 1 hour per day.
Original comment by dbarashev
on 1 Mar 2012 at 9:29
Thank your very much. Didn't mean to sound pushy...just trying to understand
your language. GanttProject is a super product!! I deeply appreciate all you
guys have done. If I could code...I'd offer to work on the feature.
Original comment by thompson...@sbcglobal.net
on 1 Mar 2012 at 10:08
This is a great piece of software! ....Alas, I need task time to be hours/days
Original comment by vdm.he...@gmail.com
on 21 May 2012 at 6:44
Hello,
an exception is actually thrown when we try to validate a duration lower than 1.
Here is A piece of the exception's stacktrace :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
sept. 15, 2012 6:56:21 PM net.sourceforge.ganttproject.GPLogger logToLogger
WARNING: FIXME: Failed to compute calendar activities in time period=0.0 day
starting from Wed Sep 05 00:00:00 UTC 2012
java.lang.RuntimeException: FIXME: Failed to compute calendar activities in
time period=0.0 day starting from Wed Sep 05 00:00:00 UTC 2012
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.calendar.GPCalendarBase.shiftDate(GPCalendarBase.java:37)
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.calendar.WeekendCalendarImpl.shiftDate(WeekendCalendarImpl.java:43)
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.task.TaskImpl.shiftDate(TaskImpl.java:968)
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.task.TaskImpl.calculateEnd(TaskImpl.java:349)
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.task.TaskImpl.getEnd(TaskImpl.java:340)
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.task.TaskNode.getEnd(TaskNode.java:98)
at net.sourceforge.ganttproject.GanttTreeTableModel.getValueAt(GanttTreeTableModel.java:286)
at org.jdesktop.swing.JXTreeTable$TreeTableModelAdapter.getValueAt(JXTreeTable.java:1243)
at javax.swing.JTable.getValueAt(Unknown Source)
at org.jdesktop.swing.JXTable.getValueAt(JXTable.java:402)
at javax.swing.JTable.prepareRenderer(Unknown Source)
at org.jdesktop.swing.JXTable.prepareRenderer(JXTable.java:706)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original comment by ol1jb2007
on 15 Sep 2012 at 5:23
I will apreciate very much duration in hours. Is important to my projects.
Original comment by jvmuh...@gmail.com
on 7 Jan 2013 at 6:24
Sorry for starring this twice :(
This is a fantastic piece of software, and I appreciate that you've produced it.
Unfortunately, as a construction professional for whom most tasks are measured
in hours, with task Duration limited to Days, it is essentially unusable for my
profession.
Original comment by cziss...@gmail.com
on 8 Jan 2013 at 8:31
2 years to fix this?
wow.
For me the app is absolutely not usable at all with durations bigger tha 1 day.
Original comment by jerobarr...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2013 at 5:48
I don't understand why this is not included already. This is a need !
Original comment by leger.fr...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 9:58
To all who complain why things do not advance.
1. This is a free product, build by people in their free time. Give them some
slack !!
2. If you want to push for some features, I might help to donate and ask the
dev team to develop 'your' feature with priority (if possible). Then the devs
will feel more motivated and appriciated. Then is is worthy for example to take
the day off at the normal job to work on this.
Original comment by jan.sy...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 10:09
A little bit of code bounty sounds nice, i could donate some bitcoins for this
feature.
Original comment by jerobarr...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 8:19
Just want to let you know guys that this feature touches a lot of code and
requires a few weeks of skilled development. It is not a matter of just one day.
Original comment by dbarashev
on 8 Apr 2013 at 8:44
Ok, guys, do the math:
2 weeks of dev, dayrate of 300 dollar (to keep is reasonable cheap)
Gives the total sum of 3000 dollar.
To all those that were so interested in this feature. Are you willing to bounce
for a part of that money ?
Original comment by jan.sy...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2013 at 9:41
I'll put in $20...
John Tapper
LookSharp! Marketing
800-818-5520
john@looksharponline.com
Original comment by jtlooksh...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2013 at 8:44
I just put down 42 dollars myself, as Dmitry can confirm. This is a feature I'm
willing to pay for! And though I don't know much about Java (just
ECMAScript)... I'm willing to work in between projects (as a chemical engineer)
and planning a wedding with my future wife.
I really like the Gantt Project, but I strongly believe that we all need to
pitch in to make it even better.
Original comment by rolandog
on 29 Apr 2013 at 11:54
Kickstart this thing!
Original comment by jtlooksh...@gmail.com
on 30 Apr 2013 at 1:48
Really nice software and duration in hours would make it applicable to many
more projects. Thanks
Original comment by p.bu...@gmail.com
on 15 May 2013 at 12:29
Love the simpliocity, but need to deregister! I cannot use this without hours.
Good Luck!
Original comment by brettanr...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2013 at 11:58
[deleted comment]
Great piece of software. But like to have the duration in hours. Will put in
$40.
Original comment by sridharpandu
on 10 Sep 2013 at 6:26
cosign
Original comment by tonypark...@gmail.com
on 1 Oct 2013 at 2:26
I would like to have an option to get rid of the calendar use arbitrary time
duration, for example, decimal seconds starting at time=0. This would be very
helpful for creating timing diagrams for automated systems. If you're going to
do hours, could you add options for other time units as well?
Great software, very easy to use!
-Chris
Original comment by cmefry...@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2013 at 10:01
I too would like to have hours and minutes so that a plan that leads to a
single (or multiple-) day event with a minute-by-minute schedule can be planned
within the day.
I wouldn't mind if it was a separate project page. I could do long-range
planning with the current set-up, then switch to the Day-Of page to plan and
examine the "minutia", so to speak.
An example of one that does scale from months, weeks and days to hours and (5)
minutes is http://www.tomsplanner.com
But it does not have a resource loading view like GanttPoject or OpenProj.
Original comment by youthhar...@gmail.com
on 1 Mar 2014 at 2:54
I agree to the above, let's pump it up!!! There's should be a way to raise some
money to help get this feature implemented!
Thanks for this great software
Original comment by carlo.to...@gmail.com
on 15 Mar 2014 at 8:13
I am also looking for this functionality, and as said before, i would also pay
to have the functionality of hours and minutes implemented!
Original comment by AsSliQ...@gmail.com
on 28 Mar 2014 at 3:03
I bought MS Project as I have to be able to have units less than 1 day
Original comment by Smith.Ra...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2014 at 5:25
Gentlemen, what is your priority for this request? If the implementation is
planned in the next couple of months, ready to join in the funding.
And again, a very convenient software. Thank you!
Original comment by a.mina...@imya-m.ru
on 5 May 2014 at 6:31
Also would like to applaud the success of this project. Scheduling by hours
would help me greatly too.
Original comment by thegreen...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2014 at 8:35
I ALSO APPLAUD this program, but hours would definitely be the turning card for
me using this over ms project
Original comment by cyplexd...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2014 at 3:38
I cannot use this app if I cannot write hours duration. :((((((((((((((
3 years and nothing ?
Original comment by ramon.ba...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2014 at 2:21
This app is essentially useless without this. In fact, it'll be much more
usable if it had hours as duration, and no days at all.
Love the app, but can't use it.
Original comment by carlosal...@tidalwaveapp.com
on 5 Jun 2014 at 5:13
[deleted comment]
Please implement the "duration in hours" feature - it is the major requirement!!
Original comment by brainsh...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2014 at 12:37
Also cannot use it without at least hours.....agree with #38....just hours, no
days would be more useful if that cuts down on the development time....Would
contribute $40 to get the feature. It looks to me like if you sent out a
request for funding to your community, it is likely that a high percentage
would donate a bit to get the feature.
Original comment by darryl...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2014 at 7:05
I understand that is an open source project, but the impossibility of set a
duration less then one day doesn't make sense.
Original comment by danilo.a...@gmail.com
on 20 Aug 2014 at 2:57
This is a major missing component... add this and the ability to track resource
costs and its pretty much complete. I too will have to use something else, but
this sw is awesome....
Original comment by michaelr...@gmail.com
on 30 Aug 2014 at 7:45
Duration in a wide range of units would be helpful. I'm looking at cycle time
optimization and dependencies where 1 second (or even 1 millisecond) increments
would be perfect!
Original comment by spartacu...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2014 at 7:41
Agree with the June 5 comment. Would be better to just have hours instead of
days if it can't have both. Then you could set 24hrs for a day.
This is the ONLY feature keeping me from recommending it to our company. Great,
great software, but fairly impractical if you can't divide to anything less
than 24 hr units. Seems like a fundamental requirement for a project management
software.
Also, with the number of people requesting it, agree that a request for funding
to get this feature would likely bring you more resources and ultimately bring
back those users who want to use this software but are not able to as it is.
Original comment by tjlens...@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2014 at 2:47
Another vote for the addition of hours to the duration settings
Original comment by DanielJo...@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2014 at 2:32
Useless if one can't specify dedication in hours
Original comment by marcom...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2015 at 10:52
+1 on hours. I'd like to see this in hours. I'd like to utilize Gantt chart's
for Backup & Recovery projects.
I'd like to see this be able to pull data from a SQL database. For instance,
pull run-times (Typically in hours) from a table and present run-time's in
Gantt form. This way I can tell which servers are taking the longest, and allow
me to visualize where I should be placing servers in the back up.
Thanks,
Justin
Original comment by justin.m...@gmail.com
on 18 Jan 2015 at 3:40
Must needed feature. I end up with resources with 800% usage per day because
multiple tasks are completed a day often in 1-3 hours.
Original comment by ke...@broten.ca
on 7 Feb 2015 at 3:21
> 1. This is a free product, build by people in their free time.
This is what I really do not understand. People spend tons of their time
implementing software like this, and leave out key features which renders the
software useless for a significant portion of their target audience. What is
the point?
1 day per task as a minimum -- I mean, really???
Original comment by michael....@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2015 at 6:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Harborou...@gmail.com
on 19 Apr 2011 at 2:38