Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I have installed everything for the source code just like the F.A.Q. says.
I use the runbot.bat and in fact it does open the bot.
I tryed using 2.2 Beta9 this way and it still does the same error.
After logging in, after some time a Fatal Error Message apears saying:
Critical error:Not enough technologies researched to run the bot
I used the bot in www.ogame.com.pt
Hope you can fix this soon... Cause it seems like many people are using the bot
with
sucess. Maybe in the www.ogame.com.pt that it still doesn't work.
Thanks for your time and keep up the good work =)
Original comment by danili...@gmail.com
on 7 Jun 2007 at 3:52
yes. ogame.org is sucess.but i try to use in ogame.com.cn is error like you .
Original comment by dogj...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2007 at 2:47
Critical error:Not enough technologies researched to run the bot
this error is given when technologies are not found. combustion and impulse
level 1
is enough to bypass this error.
if you have both, but still gives error, check language file. check combustion
and
impulse translations, maybe its changed at your language.
i am not sure of espionage tech.
language file:
[technologies]
espionageTechnology = Espionage Technology
...
combustionDrive = Combustion Drive
impulseDrive = Impulse Drive
Original comment by oga...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2007 at 10:31
Original comment by jsceballos
on 9 Jun 2007 at 10:03
I think that is this that causes the problem:
> penghui.ch...@gmail.com escreveu:
> > (1)The member function "getInvestigationLevels" of class WebAdapter
> > does NOT work, I think maybe generateRegexps function has one bug...
> I had the same problem in the portuguese servers, it seems that on
> those servers there is an extra space after the level of the tecnology
> and the ')', like this:
> Tecnologia de Espionagem (Nível 8 )
Original comment by lexmachi...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2007 at 12:23
@lexamchinaster: that member function doesn't exist!.
Original comment by jsceballos
on 10 Jun 2007 at 2:10
I'm closing this one to clean things up a bit.
Original comment by jsceballos
on 10 Jun 2007 at 2:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
danili...@gmail.com
on 6 Jun 2007 at 7:55