Idea 11464779: Introduce a different approach for resolving ambiguity of record types
Status : declined
Submitted by Kevin Rood on 1/15/2016 12:00:00 AM
3 votes
See the example here under the "Conflict Resolution" heading:
http://davefancher.com/2012/11/27/f-record-types/
Prefixing the type on a label seems inconsistent with how types are annotated elsewhere in the language. Perhaps something like this with the type annotation on the end would be more consistent:
"let myRecord = {} : RecordTypeName"
Idea 11464779: Introduce a different approach for resolving ambiguity of record types
Status : declined
Submitted by Kevin Rood on 1/15/2016 12:00:00 AM
3 votes
See the example here under the "Conflict Resolution" heading: http://davefancher.com/2012/11/27/f-record-types/ Prefixing the type on a label seems inconsistent with how types are annotated elsewhere in the language. Perhaps something like this with the type annotation on the end would be more consistent: "let myRecord = {} : RecordTypeName"