Open barry-jones opened 5 years ago
It is also incorrect then the generic type is defined in the library.
class Issue36_GenericReturnTypes<T>
{
public Issue36_GenericReturnTypes<string> ReturnInLibraryGenericType() => null;
}
Produces the display name Issue36_GenericReturnTypes<T>
. The syntax for the method is displayed correctly.
When a return type is a generic type e.g. List the return type shows simply as List<>.
Perhaps the following would be better:
Would show in the documentation as:
Returns ContentEntry - Details of return value