Closed nitzanav closed 8 years ago
Hey, thanks for the feedback!
That sounds like a reasonable addition. What would be a good short name for it? aattr_initialize
? Too similar?
I agree that aattr_initialize is the right short name because it follows your convention in the best way.
I personally use the long names since they are more readable. Your methods are doing so much in so little code. Hence I don't see any reason to save 3 more characters as I saved so much already.
Sounds fair. Alright, if someone wants to make a PR for this it would be great. If not I'll leave this on my todo list and hope to get to it some day :)
Closed by PR #21.
Hi,
I love attr_extras, I use it everywhere, and chose it the tenth of alternative, great work guys.
Though I have case that I need reader, writer and initializer. sometimes private, public or protected.
So why not enabling something like:
Instead of this:
or this: