Closed pxlpnk closed 8 years ago
I am already waiting 19 minutes for this PR to be merged! Don't you accept any contributions? :smiling_imp:
I'm sill meditating whether a file with no dots in it, should carry the file extension dot. BRB
Maybe call it 0.not
?
+0
That or 0.notdotfile
0.notdotfile
seems a bit long. how about 0.notdot
?
Currently prototyping with ln -s /dev/null dots/0.dot
how about a dd if=/dev/zero of=0.dot bs=1 count=1
?
Come to think of it, I could just drop the .dot
, generate dots/{0,1,2,3,4} with corresponding dots and squat #4 with a whole bunch of valid Graphviz files in dots/{0,1,2,3,4}.dot.
Maybe namespace the dot files in dots/dot/1.dot
Dotfile
so everyone can customize it to their liking.['digraph {', Array.new(100, "•").join(' -> '), '}'].join
This could be used to fill the XX.dot
dotfiles with dot compatible syntax to create a dot graph with a dot using dot
.
0.dont
is for me the obvious choice.
Because sometimes you need no dots at all.