Remove +Q and +e flags from being generated if using R15

[jaredmorrow]

Erlang R15 does not support the +Q or +e flags. This change simple applies a translation to remove those flags if R15 is being used.

[seancribbs]

As @joedevivo pointed out to me privately, this fixes the issue but breaks the unit tests for the schema.

[joedevivo]

@seancribbs and I worked out a solution today that will be able to tell the difference between R15 and R16 versions of these options (shoutout to Bjorn). Watch this PR tomorrow.

[jaredmorrow]

Passed tests on R15B01, R16B02, and R16B02-basho4

+1

[jaredmorrow]

Changing the comparison to fact check the claim that equals to be true led to an eunit failure:

in function cuttlefish:'-otp_test/0-fun-10-'/0 (src/cuttlefish.erl, line 139)
in call from cuttlefish:otp_test/0 (src/cuttlefish.erl, line 139)
**error:{assertion_failed,[{module,cuttlefish},
                   {line,139},
                   {expression,"otp ( \"R16A\" , \"R16A\" )"},
                   {expected,true},
                   {value,false}]}

[joedevivo]

I see where to problem is. I'll take care of it when I get back to the computer

[joedevivo]

OMG it's so much less complicated now.

[seancribbs]

+1 passes on R15B01, R16B01, R16B02-basho3

[joedevivo]

LMAO they changed the naming convention and R17 will just be "17.0"

[jaredmorrow]

Well we have at least another major before having to worry about it. So for now just file an issue.

On Saturday, February 1, 2014, Joe DeVivo notifications@github.com wrote:

LMAO they changed the naming convention and R17 will just be "17.0"

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/basho/cuttlefish/pull/114#issuecomment-33870111 .