GPL with CSS is iffy

[FeepingCreature]

What does it even mean to "distribute the sources" for a site using a GPL'd CSS file?

Please consider switching to a less ambiguous license, like BSD, MIT, Apache or Creative Commons. The GPL is intended for source code. Using it for scripts or theming creates confusion.

I have a website. Its PHP code is not open source. Can I use this CSS with it? The CSS is distributed in source form, but the "source code" of the site is not. Not even the FSF have stated clearly whether this is permissible.

[bassjobsen]

Thanks for your request. I have no objection to switch to MIT. Also @dalegaspi, @matplane and @jarollz should agree??

[dalegaspi]

no objections here. :-)

On Dec 12, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Bass Jobsen notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks for your request. I have no objection to switch to MIT. Also @dalegaspi https://github.com/dalegaspi, @matplane https://github.com/matplane and @jarollz https://github.com/jarollz should agree??

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/bassjobsen/typeahead.js-bootstrap-css/issues/6#issuecomment-66771772.

[jarollz]

No objections.

./roland -L -b

On Dec 12, 2014 10:29 PM, "Dexter Legaspi" notifications@github.com wrote:

no objections here. :-)

On Dec 12, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Bass Jobsen notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks for your request. I have no objection to switch to MIT. Also @dalegaspi https://github.com/dalegaspi, @matplane < https://github.com/matplane> and @jarollz https://github.com/jarollz should agree??

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/bassjobsen/typeahead.js-bootstrap-css/issues/6#issuecomment-66771772>.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/bassjobsen/typeahead.js-bootstrap-css/issues/6#issuecomment-66787121 .

[bassjobsen]

Thank you all!

[matplane]

A bit late, but no objection ;)

[bassjobsen]

@matplane, thank you very much too!!