(only!) 12 suspicious DOIs found in v0.4 and v0.5

[jhpoelen]

After "clicking" on about 160k DOIs in v0.4, I found only 12 DOIs that were not redirected (code 302). Wow! Great work @ajacsherman !

Here's the breakdown of the associated DOIs -

$ cat doi-status.tsv | cut -f1  | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
  15952 302
     11 404
      1 000

Here's the non-redirecting DOIs with their associated result code (404, 000).

Looks like the '000' is related to a 404 doi that was chopped off with whitespace / newline somehow (e.g., https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. and pone.0200303)

Also, it appears that for the https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00571-2022 related DOIs, an em-dash was used instead of the expected hyphen. In replacing the em-dash with a hyphen, the DOI appeared to redirect ok.

404 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2008.0030-1299.16212.x
404 https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.06633
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00571-2022
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00036-2017
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00237-2019
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00063-2018
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00019-2017
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00503-2021
404 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
000 pone.0200303
404 https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-325.1.Key
404 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla

[jhpoelen]

For the v0.5 release, the suspicious DOIs remain similar to those reported for v0.4 -

404 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2008.0030-1299.16212.x
404 https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.06633
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00571-2022
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00036-2017
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00237-2019
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00063-2018
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00019-2017
404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00503-2021
404 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
000 pone.0200303
404 https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-325.1.Key
404 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla

@ajacsherman are you aware of these DOI issues related to the batlit corpus. They seem relatively easy fixes, as they are mostly typos (em dashes -> dashes).

[ajacsherman]

Morning, My searches for these are not coming up with anything. Can you point me to the records these came from? Best, Aja

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 4:24 PM Jorrit Poelen @.***> wrote:

For the v0.5 release, the suspicious DOIs remain similar to those reported for v0.4 -

404 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2008.0030-1299.16212.x 404 https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.06633 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00571-2022 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00036-2017 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00237-2019 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00063-2018 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00019-2017 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00503-2021 404 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. 000 pone.0200303 404 https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-325.1.Key 404 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla

@ajacsherman https://github.com/ajacsherman are you aware of these DOI issues related to the batlit corpus. They seem relatively easy fixes, as they are mostly typos (em dashes -> dashes).

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bat-literature/bat-literature.github.io/issues/21#issuecomment-2299701035, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXI3CB7DIK2LUBOS3G52HUDZSOQXXAVCNFSM6AAAAABL47WNQ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJZG4YDCMBTGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Aja Sherman MS Bat Eco-Interactions Database Curator https://batbase.org/ 914-886-8906 @. @. she/her

[ajacsherman]

Good morning,

These DOIs have been edited. Can you run the report and let me know if there are remaining corrupt links? Any other suspicious links, citations, etc.?

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303 and 10.1002/jcla.20205 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.20205 lacked mention to bats, so I deleted these records.

Hope you had a good weekend,

Aja

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 4:24 PM Jorrit Poelen @.***> wrote:

For the v0.5 release, the suspicious DOIs remain similar to those reported for v0.4 -

404 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2008.0030-1299.16212.x 404 https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.06633 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00571-2022 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00036-2017 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00237-2019 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00063-2018 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00019-2017 404 https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix–00503-2021 404 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. 000 pone.0200303 404 https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-325.1.Key 404 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla

@ajacsherman https://github.com/ajacsherman are you aware of these DOI issues related to the batlit corpus. They seem relatively easy fixes, as they are mostly typos (em dashes -> dashes).

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bat-literature/bat-literature.github.io/issues/21#issuecomment-2299701035, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXI3CB7DIK2LUBOS3G52HUDZSOQXXAVCNFSM6AAAAABL47WNQ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJZG4YDCMBTGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Aja Sherman MS Bat Eco-Interactions Database Curator https://batbase.org/ 914-886-8906 @. @. she/her

[jhpoelen]

Hey @ajacsherman,

Thanks for responding to these suspicious DOI reports.

Re-running to DOI report would be done on the next release, if there is one. I realize that any release will have stuff to improve, so at some point we'll have to call it done. With the major improvements you've made between v0.4 and v0.5, I wonder whether it is worth the efforts (it takes some time to do a release due to the Zotero Web API-based architecture: all records have to be revisited all the time to make versioned snapshots).

Also, I am curious what Ariadna and @n8upham have to say about v0.5 . So far they were the ones expressing an interest in reviewing v0.5, and they haven't yet reported any comments as far as I can tell.

Curious to hear your thoughts, -jorrit

[jhpoelen]

closing issue in favor of a more recent DOI report in https://github.com/bat-literature/bat-literature.github.io/issues/30