Closed fredRos closed 8 years ago
If this isn't seriously used at the moment, I'm also in favour of removing it for now.
I also vote to remove it until it can be cleaned up and documented.
Dan
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, 19:47 Oliver Schulz notifications@github.com wrote:
If this isn't seriously used at the moment, I'm also in favour of removing it for now.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/bat/bat/issues/101#issuecomment-159698834.
Daniel Greenwald Physik-Department E18 Technische Universität München James-Franck-Str. 1 85748 Garching Germany
daniel.greenwald@tum.de tel : +49 89 / 289 12569 fax : +49 89 / 289 12570
I was just working on #77 and realized there's not much documentation on mvc. Nothing really comes up in the doxygen output because the comments that exist are not in doxygen format. In any case, they only give much more information than the name of the method that they come along with. I'm missing a bigger picture of what this is good for and how it is to be used. The examples don't provide much insight either. I don't know what it does so I don't want to maintain it.
We have had this discussion before but now we are getting serious. I vote for removing it from 1.0. It's not part of the core so we can add it back in later if there is documentation on it, presumably from @kevin-kroeninger . Any objections to removing
models/mvc
andexamples/advanced/mvc
now?