bauerdavid
commented
1 year ago It seems I skipped this issue... 🙁 Actually I determine the bounding box size along z by calculating the average size along x and y. If your object is elongated along z, then it won't fit into the bounding box. The problem is that it isn't always good to have too many z-slices (for example when working with spheroids). But I see that different use cases need different size options to handle size suggestions along the invisible dimensions. That is why I plan to allow the user to change how it will be determined (some multiple of the average of x-y, fixed etc.). But this will only be solved later... Currently I'm the only one working on this project, so there's a huge To-Do list 😄. But this features is there for sure!
marabuuu
Hi @bauerdavid,
When using the bounding boxes sometimes not the whole object is in the bounding box in z for me (see screenshot):
Dataset from Ozpolat, B. et al licensed CC BY 4.0 of the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii, nuclei channel, rescaled.
I assume that the problem is that this object is bigger than the other objects in my image, but in my opinion it would be better to create a bounding box with too many z-slices than one with not enough :)
Best, Mara