I tried to follow what https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_go/issues/4013#issuecomment-2286007545 observed, but I think this that log was misleading. I suspect the reason one of the packages was unused is that the test is too simple - if we had a another binary that depended on lib/dep and didn't participate in the cycle, it would have ended up using the other version of lib/dep.
So we probably do need an aspect if we want to clean this up
I tried to follow what https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_go/issues/4013#issuecomment-2286007545 observed, but I think this that log was misleading. I suspect the reason one of the packages was unused is that the test is too simple - if we had a another binary that depended on
lib/depand didn't participate in the cycle, it would have ended up using the other version oflib/dep.So we probably do need an aspect if we want to clean this up
What type of PR is this?
What does this PR do? Why is it needed?
Which issues(s) does this PR fix?
Fixes #
Other notes for review