Other - adding test case proving x archive isn't stable as intended
related to #4111
How to Use
Run bazel run //tests/core/go_library/reproducible_x:show_not_reproducible to build a go_library and hash the .x archive, and then to modify the implementation slightly, but not to change the package interface and expect the resulting .x hash to remain constant.
It was suggested that a sufficiently simple test case could result in source code being inlined into callers and thus modifying the resulting x archive, so I grabbed a "calculator" file to demonstrate sufficiently complex code that should result in a stable interface. In my tests, the resulting archive is not stable.
What type of PR is this?
Other - adding test case proving x archive isn't stable as intended
related to #4111
How to Use
Run
bazel run //tests/core/go_library/reproducible_x:show_not_reproducibleto build a go_library and hash the .x archive, and then to modify the implementation slightly, but not to change the package interface and expect the resulting .x hash to remain constant.It was suggested that a sufficiently simple test case could result in source code being inlined into callers and thus modifying the resulting x archive, so I grabbed a "calculator" file to demonstrate sufficiently complex code that should result in a stable interface. In my tests, the resulting archive is not stable.