bazelbuild / bazel

a fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system
https://bazel.build
Apache License 2.0
23k stars 4.03k forks source link

bazel query --output=proto should include information about whether the attribute has cfg = "exec" #22440

Open timothyg-stripe opened 4 months ago

timothyg-stripe commented 4 months ago

Description of the feature request:

We would like the Attribute protobuf message in build.proto to contain a field, tentatively called cfg_is_exec, that is set to true if the attribute has the exec transition (cfg = "exec").

Which category does this issue belong to?

Configurability

What underlying problem are you trying to solve with this feature?

Context: To run static analysis checks on our code repository, we would like to run one large bazel query --output=proto, and then process its output through other tools. Most of the query language can be simulated in this way given a repo-wide query dump, along with some Bazel options like --noimplicit_deps. However, we found that the Bazel option --notool_deps cannot be simulated, since the query dump contains no information about whether an attribute has cfg = "exec" or not.

Numerous precedents exist:


Also: I understand that bazel cquery (+ bazel config) would give us the necessary information. However, we currently have several reasons to avoid running cquery on the entire repo.

Which operating system are you running Bazel on?

macOS

What is the output of bazel info release?

release 7.1.2

If bazel info release returns development version or (@non-git), tell us how you built Bazel.

No response

What's the output of git remote get-url origin; git rev-parse HEAD ?

No response

Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?

No.

Any other information, logs, or outputs that you want to share?

No response

fmeum commented 4 months ago

Instead of just a boolean, could we maybe make this a string field that is either exec, target or //some/pkg:defs.bzl%my_starlark_transition (assuming the transition is exported)? @katre is working on chaining transitions, which could mean that an exec transition is hiding within a Starlark one.