I am trying to retain the .gcov files from running coverage and am using --experimental_fetch_all_coverage_outputs mentioned here. When I run the coverage command, I get an error
Sep 23, 2024 5:49:19 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main getTracefiles
INFO: No lcov file found.
Sep 23, 2024 5:49:19 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main getGcovInfoFiles
INFO: Found 1 gcov info files.
Sep 23, 2024 5:49:19 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main parseFilesSequentially
INFO: Parsing file /private/var/tmp/_bazel_oliver/428b4df1ffa12884ed645567c097dd18/sandbox/darwin-sandbox/37/execroot/coverage-example/bazel-out/darwin_arm64-fastbuild/testlogs/test/lib_test/_coverage/_cc_coverage.gcov
Sep 23, 2024 5:49:19 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main getGcovJsonInfoFiles
INFO: No gcov json file found.
Sep 23, 2024 5:49:19 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main getProfdataFileOrNull
INFO: No .profdata file found.
================================================================================
ERROR: /Users/oliver/repos/basic-coverage-example/test/BUILD.bazel:1:8: Error while validating output TreeArtifact File:[[<execution_root>]bazel-out/darwin_arm64-fastbuild/testlogs]test/lib_test/_coverage : Child gcov of tree artifact /private/var/tmp/_bazel_oliver/428b4df1ffa12884ed645567c097dd18/execroot/coverage-example/bazel-out/darwin_arm64-fastbuild/testlogs/test/lib_test/_coverage is a dangling symbolic link
ERROR: /Users/oliver/repos/basic-coverage-example/test/BUILD.bazel:1:8: Testing //test:lib_test failed: not all outputs were created or valid
Which category does this issue belong to?
No response
What's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.
Description of the bug:
I am trying to retain the
.gcov
files from running coverage and am using--experimental_fetch_all_coverage_outputs
mentioned here. When I run the coverage command, I get an errorWhich category does this issue belong to?
No response
What's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.
clone https://github.com/oliverlee/basic-coverage-example and run:
Which operating system are you running Bazel on?
macOS 14.6
What is the output of
bazel info release
?7.1.0
If
bazel info release
returnsdevelopment version
or(@non-git)
, tell us how you built Bazel.No response
What's the output of
git remote get-url origin; git rev-parse HEAD
?No response
If this is a regression, please try to identify the Bazel commit where the bug was introduced with bazelisk --bisect.
No response
Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?
No response
Any other information, logs, or outputs that you want to share?
No response