search

bazelbuild / rules_fuzzing

Bazel Starlark extensions for defining fuzz tests in Bazel projects
Apache License 2.0
82 stars 19 forks source link

Incorrect SHA256 for v0.2.0.zip #172

Closed grencez closed 2 years ago

grencez commented 2 years ago

Expected Behavior

I'd expect a correct sha256 hash for v0.2.0.zip listed in the README and latest release (https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_fuzzing/releases/tag/v0.2.0).

Actual Behavior

The given hash (9b688a77b930e1842312d37b00fbb796b96323a2eb8362b2cfb68e7d6e74f860) is for the release's .tar.gz file, not the .zip. The .zip's contents do not differ (verified with diff -r), so the documented hash could just be updated to the correct one (127d7c45e9b7520b3c42145b3cb1b8c26477cdaed0521b02a0298907339fefa1).

Steps to Reproduce the Problem

  1. wget https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_fuzzing/archive/v0.2.0.zip
  2. sha256sum v0.2.0.zip

Specifications

stefanbucur commented 2 years ago

The given hash (9b688a77b930e1842312d37b00fbb796b96323a2eb8362b2cfb68e7d6e74f860) is for the release's .tar.gz file, not the .zip.

You are absolutely right - this is exactly what happened. I computed the hash for the wrong file extension. Thanks for flagging this - fix is out in #173.