Closed Malabarba closed 9 years ago
Sure, whichever people prefer.
Ping :-) Any thoughts on this?
I like the second option, naturally.
Any idea when lm-version
was introduced?
Before 1992.
@Bruce-Connor I don't like these version constants. These days, they are redundant at best—we have the version in package headers anyway—and wrong at worst—if they diverge from the official version in the headers.
We should really recommend lm-version
.
Yeah, seems there's a consensus regarding this. :-)
Yes. lm-version os certainly much better.
Besides the
;; Version:
comment, it's useful for packages to define their version numbers as variables. Something like the following should be enough.