Closed germain-gg closed 6 years ago
Very cool! What sort of testing were you thinking of?
Since this was mainly a manual process I just want to double check that I haven't forgotten or miscopied anything.
Besides that I would say that those changes are pretty safe as everything is meant to work exactly the same
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, 17:52 Pete Taylour, notifications@github.com wrote:
Very cool! What sort of testing were you thinking of?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bbc/VideoContext/pull/105#issuecomment-421419252, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAu_T7TZai-KBbFmz6U6Jkf79OdeHy1Oks5ua964gaJpZM4Wpl4n .
Are you happy with this being merged now? All the current tests are happy
Yup, I believe it is all good to go! Thank you for taking the time to get those ready
Hi,
Sorry this is a pretty hefty PR, however it is mostly copy and pasted code.
I had quite a lot of problems to read the different shaders because they were embedded in a JavaScript string.
This PR create a private module for every effect and externalise the fragments and the vertices to external files (yay syntax highlighting!)
It also uses a webpack
raw-loader
to be able to load those files, and uses a mock JavaScript module when running the unit tests https://jestjs.io/docs/en/webpackI'll probably do a bit more testing but I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.
Thank you,