Closed IndrajeetPatil closed 3 years ago
It makes sense for the gamlss
and gam
(and Gam
) tidiers to stick together. There's also https://github.com/tidymodels/broom/issues/596 discussing how to implement tidiers for GAMMs. I think these tidiers could arguably belong in:
broom
broom.mixed
gratia
I don't have strong feelings.
I have opened a PR at broom
(https://github.com/tidymodels/broom/pull/653) that brings the gamlss
tidier up to speed with changes made to the same tidier in broom.mixed
.
Let's keep tidy.gamlss()
in broom
then. Will merge that in when I get a moment.
@alexpghayes and @bbolker: The development version of
broom
has gotten rid of all the shared S3 methods between these two packages except for one:gamlss
.What's the future of this tidier?
broom
orbroom.mixed
? This is especially important becausebroom.mixed
has changed this tidier since it separated frombroom
, while the latter hasn't changed. This meanstidy()
will return results based on whatever method is currently loaded.