Closed bcalden closed 1 year ago
Hi Brian!
Any progress on this? I'm happy to try to hack together an ACIS-S enhancement using your dev-ciao-4.13
branch, if you'd like. But I don't want to replicate work you're already doing!
Hi Grant!
There is some progress on this issue. Definitely not ready for release and lots of naming issues still exist (generated files named acisI.fits instead of acisS.fits). However, ACIS-S observations can be processed through the dev 4.13 pipeline as it stands. I just processed A545, OBSID 13998 to test and it appeared to produce a reasonable temperature/pressure map. I have not tried a mixed ACIS-I and ACIS-S observation but am glad to actively help navigate through the code if there are any issues that arise.
Thank you Brian! Just to be absolutely clear as we test this on ACIS-S observations: all region files the user creates should be in ciao
format and physical
coordinates, with the exception of master_crop-ciaowcs.reg
(which should be in ciao
format with wcs
coordinates). Correct?
My first response was going to be yes until I went through a cluster real quick to check how I do it. Every cluster I have processed lately used wcs
coordinates in ds9
format for all region files. I don't want to say there are no formatting restrictions anymore, but I think the ciao/ds9 and physical/wcs coordinate rigidity is a vestige of older code.
To be explicit about it, my sources.reg
, exclude.reg
, master_crop-ciaowcs.reg
, and acisI_region_0.reg
are all in ds9
format with wcs
coordinates.
If this does not work on your end please let me know and I will attempt to track down the issue.
The pipeline should allow for the inclusion of ACIS-S observations within the pipeline.