search

bcardiff / docker-rclone

Docker image to use rclone to run cron sync with monitoring
https://hub.docker.com/r/bcardiff/rclone
MIT License
78 stars 60 forks source link

Replace "rclone ls" with "rclone lsf"? #3

Closed wolfv6 closed 5 years ago

wolfv6 commented 6 years ago

Not sure if this is an issue.

From line 14 in https://github.com/bcardiff/docker-rclone/blob/master/sync.sh:

if test "$(rclone ls $SYNC_SRC $RCLONE_OPTS)"; then

"rclone lsf" is a new feature on rclone 1.40, and produces a smaller output than "rclone ls". https://rclone.org/commands/rclone_lsf/ Would using "lsf" consume less bandwidth?

guillaumelachaud commented 5 years ago

I second this. I have MANY files on my gdrive account and the rclone ls takes a very long time. Having an option to bypass the check altogether would also be nice.

pfidr34 commented 5 years ago

Not sure if this is an issue.

From line 14 in https://github.com/bcardiff/docker-rclone/blob/master/sync.sh:

if test "$(rclone ls $SYNC_SRC $RCLONE_OPTS)"; then

"rclone lsf" is a new feature on rclone 1.40, and produces a smaller output than "rclone ls". https://rclone.org/commands/rclone_lsf/ Would using "lsf" consume less bandwidth?

Hi, I have updated this project to the most current version of rclone and added a ENV variable that will take ls or lsf

https://hub.docker.com/r/pfidr/rclone https://github.com/pfidr34/docker-rclone

pfidr34 commented 5 years ago

I second this. I have MANY files on my gdrive account and the rclone ls takes a very long time. Having an option to bypass the check altogether would also be nice.

Hi, I have updated this project to the most current version of rclone and added a ENV variable that will allow you to skip this check.

https://hub.docker.com/r/pfidr/rclone https://github.com/pfidr34/docker-rclone