Hello,
thanks for the work done here, it is working really good! :)
I would love to see some "feeling of the process". What I mean with that is getting some number that gives you the idea of how advanced the Synchronisation is. I tried to read the source to understand how it works, but I am not programmer myself...but if the software gets a list of files from the Local directory, and also a list of files from the remote drive, maybe a numerical hint would give the user some interesting information:
1234 Local files, 102 synced.
345 remote files, 302 synced.
(OR MAYBE 8.26% uplink synced, 87.5% downlink synced ).
Again, this is just very naive improvement, but I think it can be nice to have it (and maybe, maybe, it could be easy to implement).
Hello, thanks for the work done here, it is working really good! :)
I would love to see some "feeling of the process". What I mean with that is getting some number that gives you the idea of how advanced the Synchronisation is. I tried to read the source to understand how it works, but I am not programmer myself...but if the software gets a list of files from the Local directory, and also a list of files from the remote drive, maybe a numerical hint would give the user some interesting information: 1234 Local files, 102 synced. 345 remote files, 302 synced. (OR MAYBE 8.26% uplink synced, 87.5% downlink synced ).
Again, this is just very naive improvement, but I think it can be nice to have it (and maybe, maybe, it could be easy to implement).
Thanks again :)