search

bcgov / PSA-DJ-program

For the Digital Journey's program area planning.
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

SL Review - Decision on having 2 parts #24

Closed fazil-ey closed 1 year ago

fazil-ey commented 2 years ago

This will no longer be needed after the change in scope to an ADM led process

Questions to answer -

  1. Do we need to ask senior leaders if they are interested in an executive position? Does opting-in imply that they are?
    • Does it make sense to divide the process into 2 parts & have a conversation in the middle if most people are expected to fill the entire form as they would be interested in the executive role if they have decided to opt into this process.
  2. If so, the only relevant question is for readiness. Should we ask this question right after they opt-in?

Notes from the discussion on Aug 22 -

  1. Initially the senior leader review process included all band 4 leaders. There were a lot of them and they might have had varied career aspirations. However, now if Band 4 are included, it will only be nominated Band 4 employees.
    • It might be reasonable to expect that everyone onboarding is aiming to be in an executive role, the only thing that varies is the degree of readiness. They have have different strengths/weaknesses.
    • Therefore, the only relevant question we should ask is that if people are opting in, how ready are they. We should ask this question right in the beginning of the form, especially if we have different questions to ask based on readiness.
      1. Has the strike changed the scope of the SL review process. What considerations do we need to have?