Closed boshek closed 2 years ago
Recommend always using the permalink and not the title url as titles change. Which uses the dataset ID or can find it with the Show the Permalink button on the UI (tho easier to right click and copy url).
This is for BC Airports. https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/76b1b7a3-2112-4444-857a-afccf7b20da8
@boshek thought i should add for open data
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content?id=A519A56BC2BF44E4A008B33FCF527F61
You are free to:
- Copy, modify, publish, translate, adapt, distribute or otherwise use the Information in any medium, mode or format for any lawful purpose.
You must, where you do any of the above:
- Acknowledge the source of the Information by including any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence. If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, or if you are using Information from several Information Providers and multiple attributions are not practical for your product or application, you must use the following attribution statement:
Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – British Columbia.
So then with the airports example, we'd provide something like:
Data source: https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/76b1b7a3-2112-4444-857a-afccf7b20da8 Licensed under the Open Government Licence - British Columbia: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content?id=A519A56BC2BF44E4A008B33FCF527F61
For something that isn't the BC licence:
Data source: https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/a7627a6a-9b36-489b-ae58-edf2620083c6 Licensed under the Statistics Canada Open Licence: https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/reference/licence
How does that look? The record endpoint returns all this stuff very nicely 😄
@boshek one piece that i think is missing from the policy/licence is to include always refer back to the record to confirm licencing, as at times they can change, especially those that were "Access Only" and changed to Open Government Licence - British Columbia.
Speaking about "Access Only" it is noted in the Crown Copyright page. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content?id=1AAACC9C65754E4D89A118B875E0FBDA
I think returning the current licence is sufficient due diligence here. If someone uses bcdc_get_data_citation("bc-airports")
in a report that is published to a static medium (e.g. journal, PDF), the citation will be relevant to that date-stamped report. If a reader subsequently uses the citation to navigate to the data for further use, then any change in licence would apply at that time.
What about the human-readbale record name, with the permalink URL, licence and access date?
e.g.,
Data source: British Columbia Data Catalogue—BC Airports (https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/76b1b7a3-2112-4444-857a-afccf7b20da8), Open Government Licence - British Columbia (https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content?id=A519A56BC2BF44E4A008B33FCF527F61), accessed on 2021-05-11.
Potential here to leverage R's bibtex class:
rref <- bibentry(
bibtype = "Manual",
title = "R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing",
author = person("R Core Team"),
organization = "R Foundation for Statistical Computing",
address = "Vienna, Austria",
year = 2014,
url = "https://www.R-project.org/")
Love this. Definitely think we need the access date and the license
Will hold off working on this until #282 is merged though
It would be nice to provide a convenience function for individuals to cite a specific dataset. We can iterate exactly what but something like:
which then would return something like: