As we discussed on Teams, I'm working on a PR from my fork of this repo to add some of the new information learned from the April 2024 mapping demo day. Since the last major update to index.md, we have a lot more examples of tools across government which I think would be helpful to add to the Look and feel section of this page.
One of the things I'd like to do is simplify the table (see screenshot below) to:
add a column that makes it more clear to the reader which of the four frameworks listed in the above section applies to each tool (e.g. SaaS, Gov-hosted, DIY, or Custom)
Combine Client and Example column into one, where we have a list of the client or tool name that is hyperlinked instead of writing out the URL. This would make it easier to list multiple tools for the same framework
One question is the Complexity column. Does "complexity" apply to the framework or specific tool (looks like the latter but want to be sure). Also, how is it determined? Is it still necessary to have? The table might be neater if we dropped this column. Would love to hear thoughts.
As we discussed on Teams, I'm working on a PR from my fork of this repo to add some of the new information learned from the April 2024 mapping demo day. Since the last major update to
index.md, we have a lot more examples of tools across government which I think would be helpful to add to theLook and feelsection of this page.One of the things I'd like to do is simplify the table (see screenshot below) to:
ClientandExamplecolumn into one, where we have a list of the client or tool name that is hyperlinked instead of writing out the URL. This would make it easier to list multiple tools for the same frameworkOne question is the
Complexitycolumn. Does "complexity" apply to the framework or specific tool (looks like the latter but want to be sure). Also, how is it determined? Is it still necessary to have? The table might be neater if we dropped this column. Would love to hear thoughts.