UI Design - re-acceptance of qualified supplier agreement

[mstanton1]

GIVEN I am a qualified supplier (lawyers and notaries, manufacturers, service providers) WHEN the qualified supplier agreement is updated (new version) THEN I am prompted to accept the updated qualified supplier agreement AND If I do not accept the updated agreement I cannot complete any other transactions in MHR with the exception of search or drafts

Rules:

• a MHR qualified supplier must accept updated terms before completing any other restricted transactions (i.e. could only complete search). If easier, we could take the approach of the overarching terms and require a user accept the updated qualified supplier agreement before being able to access any MHR functionality
• these qualified supplier terms should not prevent access to any PPR functionality (or other BCROS products)
• each team member must accept these updated terms
• PENDING: confirmation from policy pending on whether an account level message is needed to advise of the terms update

Scenarios:

• a qualified supplier may be setting up a new account, and accepting terms in the modernized system. If those terms change they should be prompted to re-accept
• a qualified supplier may have access granted on the back end based upon having access previously in the legacy system. In these cases each user will need to accept the terms before completing a transaction

Current handling when BCROS system Terms of Use are updated (screenshots) https://app.zenhub.com/files/157936592/21bc250b-92ec-4e3e-8c9a-44e134393093/download

[mstanton1]

@mstanton1 to provide Tracey with screenshots of current flow in auth for re-acceptance.

[tlebedovich]

@mstanton1 - do we also need a similar modal for each individual team member that logs into an account that has qualified supplier access for the first time? And for existing qualified suppliers opening the app to see our new agreement for the first time?

[mstanton1]

@tlebedovich thanks for the question. I will update the requirements above. In most cases we are going to try to identify clients who had existing access and re-grant that access on the back-end. It's unlikely to be possible with Manufacturer's because we need to confirm their data, but should be feasible for Lawyers & Notaries and Service Providers. In those cases, since we are granting access - but they haven't accepted the updated agreement, it would be fabulous to also intercept them to require the terms be accepted.