Auth Web: show previous correspondence

[severinbeauvais]

This picks up where #21815 left off.

See Figma.

• [x] change previous correspondence items to mock-data-driven
• [x] compute list of items from mocked review/result response
• [x] replace review result mocked data with actual API calls
• [x] replace filing mocked data with actual API calls
• [x] reset validations when new Review Result is selected
• [x] add/update unit tests
• [x] change date/time conversions to use Moment
• [x] tranform all the new code to Composition API
  • ContinuationAuthorizationReview.vue
  • ExtraprovincialRegistrationBc.vue
  • HomeJurisdictionInformation.vue
  • PreviousCorrespondence.vue
  • ReviewResult.vue

Figma: https://www.figma.com/design/wVF8EcUCUR20YyqA0wHVJp/Continuation-In-V5?node-id=560-2&t=8hiBRkJTyVRCI0fZ-0

[severinbeauvais]

Blocked by UI design (and business details/approvals).

[severinbeauvais]

I bumped up the estimate as we're still working through the API response (and the endpoint is not yet available).

[severinbeauvais]

Test Notes

The Continuation Authorization Review page is now driven by data from Legal API!

But:

• the Continuation Applications table still uses mocked data
• the back end processes are incomplete, so some reviews and review_results data was manually entered in the Legal db
• the back end endpoints are incomplete, so submitting a review result may fail

The following reviews are populated and can be used for verification of this page:

• https://dev.account.bcregistry.gov.bc.ca/staff/continuation-review/1
• https://dev.account.bcregistry.gov.bc.ca/staff/continuation-review/2
• https://dev.account.bcregistry.gov.bc.ca/staff/continuation-review/3

[severinbeauvais]

Blocked while waiting for Relationships team to merge the (approved) PR.

[severinbeauvais]

Relationships team will not merge the PR until the code is transformed to Composition API and the date/time methods are changed to using Moment.

I've increased the estimate and moved this ticket back to In Progress accordingly.

[janisrogers]

This looks good and matches the design. I would change some of the words, but that could be a separate ticket. This is good to go to QA.

[janisrogers]

One strange note, is that the dates seem backwards. I assume this is just because of mocked data?

[severinbeauvais]

One strange note, is that the dates seem backwards. I assume this is just because of mocked data?

Hah, good catch. I just fixed the mock data in the database. Please have another look :)

[janisrogers]

Thanks @severinbeauvais that makes more sense.

[NaveenHebbale]

Working