Closed severinbeauvais closed 5 days ago
deleted obsolete comment
To do:
The PR for this work has been merged. UX peeps, please have a quick look and pass along to QA if satisfactory. (I think Ketaki already checked with you on styling. You can also check the PR for screenshots.)
I did review with Ketaki and the styling for this looks great. I had some concerns about the language, but was unable to get it reviewed/approved today.
I would like to simplify the language used here
Original statement
Would like to change to this
@ketaki-deodhar This language has been approved
I don't know that your statement conveys the same information. Let's discuss.
@jacqueline-williams-549 I will update it soon
Thanks @ketaki-deodhar this looks great.
In #20893, two BENs were amalgamated into a new Benefit Company. The bug is that a resolution date (pertaining to the share structure) from the primary TING was not carried over to the new TED.
[x] should we carry over all resolution dates? - yes
[x] for regular amalgamations, should we allow entry of resolution dates? no, same as creating a new IA
[x] fetch resolutions for holding/primary business, ie:
[x] show resolution dates on review page along with share structure, ie:
[ ] save in draft + resume from draft as needed
See also #23054 (back end ticket).