search

bcgov / jag-spd-spice

Security Programs Division - Security Programs Integrated Case Environment
Apache License 2.0
2 stars 9 forks source link

Bump @xmldom/xmldom from 0.7.5 to 0.7.8 in /spd-ess-portal/ClientApp #329

Open dependabot[bot] opened 2 years ago

dependabot[bot] commented 2 years ago

Bumps @xmldom/xmldom from 0.7.5 to 0.7.8.

Release notes

Sourced from @​xmldom/xmldom's releases.

0.7.8

Commits

Fixed

Thank you, @​fengxinming, for your contributions

0.7.7

Commits

Fixed

  • Security: Prevent inserting DOM nodes when they are not well-formed CVE-2022-39353 In case such a DOM would be created, the part that is not well-formed will be transformed into text nodes, in which xml specific characters like < and > are encoded accordingly. In the upcoming version 0.9.0 those text nodes will no longer be added and an error will be thrown instead. This change can break your code, if you relied on this behavior, e.g. multiple root elements in the past. We consider it more important to align with the specs that we want to be aligned with, considering the potential security issues that might derive from people not being aware of the difference in behavior. Related Spec: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-ensure-pre-insertion-validity

Thank you, @​frumioj, @​cjbarth, @​markgollnick for your contributions

0.7.6

Commits

Fixed

Thank you, @​jftanner, @​Supraja9726 for your contributions

Changelog

Sourced from @​xmldom/xmldom's changelog.

0.7.8

Fixed

Thank you, @​fengxinming, for your contributions

0.9.0-beta.4

Fixed

  • Security: Prevent inserting DOM nodes when they are not well-formed CVE-2022-39353 In case such a DOM would be created, the part that is not well-formed will be transformed into text nodes, in which xml specific characters like < and > are encoded accordingly. In the upcoming version 0.9.0 those text nodes will no longer be added and an error will be thrown instead. This change can break your code, if you relied on this behavior, e.g. multiple root elements in the past. We consider it more important to align with the specs that we want to be aligned with, considering the potential security issues that might derive from people not being aware of the difference in behavior. Related Spec: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-ensure-pre-insertion-validity

Chore

Thank you, @​XhmikosR, @​awwright, @​frumioj, @​cjbarth, @​markgollnick for your contributions

0.8.4

Fixed

  • Security: Prevent inserting DOM nodes when they are not well-formed CVE-2022-39353 In case such a DOM would be created, the part that is not well-formed will be transformed into text nodes, in which xml specific characters like < and > are encoded accordingly. In the upcoming version 0.9.0 those text nodes will no longer be added and an error will be thrown instead. This change can break your code, if you relied on this behavior, e.g. multiple root elements in the past. We consider it more important to align with the specs that we want to be aligned with, considering the potential security issues that might derive from people not being aware of the difference in behavior. Related Spec: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-ensure-pre-insertion-validity

Thank you, @​frumioj, @​cjbarth, @​markgollnick for your contributions

0.7.7

Fixed

  • Security: Prevent inserting DOM nodes when they are not well-formed CVE-2022-39353 In case such a DOM would be created, the part that is not well-formed will be transformed into text nodes, in which xml specific characters like < and > are encoded accordingly. In the upcoming version 0.9.0 those text nodes will no longer be added and an error will be thrown instead. This change can break your code, if you relied on this behavior, e.g. multiple root elements in the past. We consider it more important to align with the specs that we want to be aligned with, considering the potential security issues that might derive from people not being aware of the difference in behavior. Related Spec: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-ensure-pre-insertion-validity

... (truncated)

Commits


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/bcgov/jag-spd-spice/network/alerts).
dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

dependabot[bot] commented 1 year ago

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.