[To Main] Feature - DESENG-667: Add engagement configuration summary

[NatSquared]

Issue #: https://citz-gdx.atlassian.net/browse/DESENG-667

Description of changes:

• Feature Add engagement configuration summary 🎟️ DESENG-667

  • Added a tabbed layout to the new engagement view page
  • Added a new "Configuration" tab to display the engagement's configuration details
  • The other tabs are blank for now, but will be filled in future tickets
  • The configuration tab allows navigating back to the engagement configuration page
  • Improvements to how engagements and related resources are fetched and saved

User Guide update ticket (if applicable):

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 76.04%. Comparing base (ee6caab) to head (993d964).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2577 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 76.04% 76.04% ======================================= Files 609 609 Lines 22080 22083 +3 Branches 1785 1785 ======================================= + Hits 16790 16793 +3 Misses 5026 5026 Partials 264 264 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgov/met-public/pull/2577/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgov) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [metweb](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgov/met-public/pull/2577/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgov) | `65.03% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgov#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgov/met-public/pull/2577?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgov) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...eb/src/components/common/Indicators/StatusChip.tsx](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgov/met-public/pull/2577?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=met-web%2Fsrc%2Fcomponents%2Fcommon%2FIndicators%2FStatusChip.tsx&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgov#diff-bWV0LXdlYi9zcmMvY29tcG9uZW50cy9jb21tb24vSW5kaWNhdG9ycy9TdGF0dXNDaGlwLnRzeA==) | `76.92% <100.00%> (+3.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [met-web/src/styles/Theme.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgov/met-public/pull/2577?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=met-web%2Fsrc%2Fstyles%2FTheme.ts&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgov#diff-bWV0LXdlYi9zcmMvc3R5bGVzL1RoZW1lLnRz) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | |

[Baelx]

😂These are funny but please continue to write descriptive commit messages and include the ticket number in each one

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud