Open micheal-w-wells opened 4 years ago
AR, S, any others we'd need to include in the licensee query in order to hide these from staff and AH @LisaMoore1
Here's the original query for this one.
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW FTA_RANGE_LICENSEE AS
SELECT
PFU.FOREST_FILE_ID
, PFU.FILE_STATUS_ST
, PFU.FILE_TYPE_CODE
, FTC.DESCRIPTION AS FILE_TYPE_DESC
, ORG.ORG_UNIT_CODE
, ORG.ROLLUP_REGION_CODE
, NVL(RTN.DISTRICT_ADMN_ZONE,PFU.DISTRICT_ADMIN_ZONE) AS DISTRICT_ADMIN_ZONE
, RGZ.ZONE_DESCRIPTION
, RGZ.CONTACT
, RGZ.CONTACT_PHONE_NUMBER
, RGZ.CONTACT_EMAIL_ADDRESS
, TTM.LEGAL_EFFECTIVE_DT
, TTM.INITIAL_EXPIRY_DT
, TTM.CURRENT_EXPIRY_DT
, FFC.LICENSEE_START_DATE
, FFC.LICENSEE_END_DATE
FROM MV_PROV_FOREST_USE PFU
LEFT JOIN MV_FILE_TYPE_CODE FTC ON FTC.FILE_TYPE_CODE = PFU.FILE_TYPE_CODE
LEFT JOIN MV_RANGE_TENURE RTN ON RTN.FOREST_FILE_ID = PFU.FOREST_FILE_ID
LEFT JOIN MV_TENURE_TERM TTM ON TTM.FOREST_FILE_ID = PFU.FOREST_FILE_ID
LEFT JOIN MV_ORG_UNIT ORG ON ORG.ORG_UNIT_NO = RTN.ADMIN_FOREST_DISTRICT_NO
LEFT JOIN MV_FOREST_FILE_CLIENT FFC ON FFC.FOREST_FILE_ID = PFU.FOREST_FILE_ID
AND FFC.FOREST_FILE_CLIENT_TYPE_CODE = 'A'
LEFT JOIN MV_RANGE_ZONE RGZ ON RGZ.ADMIN_FOREST_DISTRICT_NO = RTN.ADMIN_FOREST_DISTRICT_NO
AND RGZ.RANGE_ZONE_CODE = NVL(RTN.DISTRICT_ADMN_ZONE,PFU.DISTRICT_ADMIN_ZONE)
WHERE PFU.FILE_STATUS_ST = 'A'
;
@micheal-w-wells P (pending) will need some consideration but it is a "before" it is fully active rather than after so a different thing I think.
Ok so for the 'deleting' we'll leave those alone. Thanks!
@micheal-w-wells I assume by "deleting" here you mean no longer visible in the regular work queue or accessible to initiate a plan or amendment. If that's the case all good.
That's right yep. FOREST_FILE_CLIENT_TYPE_CODE or FILE_STATUS_ST (for filtering for A, AR, P. etc)?
Hard to tell from the query because its filtering for A's in both.
@micheal-w-wells Just wondering if the query above is only going to create/replace for things that are 'A' at this point in time. I think we only want it to "create" for A and the P one(s) but we do want the ones that are now AR, RRS etc to get updated (replaced) to that in MyRA. I always have to think these queries over a million times but this one just raises question for me and I can't obviously tell if it will do what we want. I'm going to assume that you are completely all over that and I'm not going to think about it any more unless you tell me to. :)
The ORDS folks have been asked to update the endpoint in dev, we can flush out the above scenario you mentioned here @LisaMoore1 once it lands in test this week.
/remind test
@micheal-w-wells we had trouble parsing your reminder. Try:
/remind me [what] [when]
/remind me to look for the ORDS update next week
@micheal-w-wells set a reminder for Mar 27th 2020
:wave: @micheal-w-wells, look for the ORDS update
Similar to agreement status issue.