Closed mcmero closed 5 years ago
cc @JustinChu
I think this is version mismatch issue. The -a
option was removed a few versions back and moved to biobloommicategorizer
@readmanchiu Can pavfinder
be updated to use the most recent version of BioBloomTools?
@JustinChu If it's possible could the -a
option be added back to biobloomcategorizer
for compatibility with Pavfinder?
It wouldn't be advisable to do so, since all miBF functionality would have to be added back to the executable and it was seperated to avoid confusion between the tools.
@readmanchiu Sounds like pavfinder
should use biobloommicategorizer
rather than biobloomcategorizer
.
sorry about that, there has been some issues of making the changes to use the latest version of BBT, I will work on that again. The current version of BBT that TAP is compatible with is 2.1.0.
@mcmero I changed tap2 to be compatible with bbt v2.3.3, and now it uses biobloommicategorizer instead of biobloomcategorizer. Just a caveat you may have to adjust the -b parameter when you used biobloommimaker to create your filter (you may have to lower -b if you have fewer than 100 targets). Please consult @JustinChu in this regard. From our end, I'll do more testing to understand the behavior of this new BBT before I tag the release.
I am trying to run tap2 using a bloom filter like so:
tap2.py sample . --bf ../../biobloomtools-2.3.2/test/reads.bf --fq sample_R1.fastq.gz sample_R2.fastq.gz --k 79 49 --readlen 101 --nprocs 1 --params params.ini
However, I'm getting the following exception:
Looking into biobloomcategorizer, the latest version does not appear to have the
-a
option. Which version(s) of biobloomcategorizer are compatible with tap?